A participant explains how small-group stakeholder simulations and role-play foster deep engagement, multi-perspective debate, collaborative decisions, and tangible learning outcomes beyond textbooks or news.
📊 Quick Facts
| Type | Interview |
| Author | CCWA |
| Published | April 1, 2026 |
| Source | Visit Source |
| Location(s) | PANSIM World Organisation |
🖼️ Illustrations
📝 Abstract
[Summary generated by AI] This video documents the educational value of small-group stakeholder simulations, conveyed through reflections by the person interviewed. The resources used include structured, small-group settings; assigned stakeholder roles that place students in the position of world leaders or interest groups; and peer interaction that supplies diverse viewpoints. The methods emphasize role-playing, debate across opposing positions, and collaborative decision-making, requiring participants to negotiate, iterate, and compromise in order to reach shared positions. By stepping into others’ perspectives and making consequential choices with peers, the person interviewed argues that students gain a fuller grasp of complex public issues than through textbooks, opinion pieces, or lectures alone. The outcomes include heightened engagement, more equitable participation due to group size, improved capacity to synthesize contrasting perspectives, and the development of practical negotiation and compromise skills. Tangible deliverables emerge as collectively crafted decisions and agreements produced within the simulation, alongside durable, eye-opening insights into policy trade-offs. Overall, the video advances simulation-based, experiential pedagogy as a rigorous approach to cultivating deep understanding and actionable consensus-building.